<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Views from Eagle Peak &#187; Entertainment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://views.eaglepeakpress.com/category/entertainment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://views.eaglepeakpress.com</link>
	<description>Seeing things as they really are, without the illusions or delusions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 19:29:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Limbaugh admits tryst with Bill O&#8217;Reilly</title>
		<link>http://views.eaglepeakpress.com/2009/04/01/limbaugh-admits-tryst-with-bill-oreilly/</link>
		<comments>http://views.eaglepeakpress.com/2009/04/01/limbaugh-admits-tryst-with-bill-oreilly/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 17:42:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[April Fools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dittoheads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://views.eaglepeakpress.com/?p=236</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The worst fears of dittoheads were confirmed today, when Rush Limbaugh confirmed rumors that he and Bill O&#8217;Reilly have been secret lovers for several years. Birds of a feather do indeed &#8220;flock together,&#8221; as it were. Whether this will forestall planned participation on next season&#8217;s &#8220;Dancing with the Stars,&#8221; is yet to be determined.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The worst fears of dittoheads were confirmed today, when Rush Limbaugh confirmed rumors that he and Bill O&#8217;Reilly have been secret lovers for several years. Birds of a feather do indeed &#8220;flock together,&#8221; as it were. Whether this will forestall planned participation on next season&#8217;s &#8220;Dancing with the Stars,&#8221; is yet to be determined.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://views.eaglepeakpress.com/2009/04/01/limbaugh-admits-tryst-with-bill-oreilly/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Chinese food container cliche</title>
		<link>http://views.eaglepeakpress.com/2009/01/15/the-chinese-food-container-cliche/</link>
		<comments>http://views.eaglepeakpress.com/2009/01/15/the-chinese-food-container-cliche/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 17:26:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://views.eaglepeakpress.com/?p=224</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is my household the only one in America that takes the Chinese food out of the container and eats it from plates? I don&#8217;t know about you, but one of the hallmarks of eating Chinese in my house is sharing the different items with other family members. That being so, eating out of the containers [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is my household the only one in America that takes the Chinese food out of the container and eats it from plates? I don&#8217;t know about you, but one of the hallmarks of eating Chinese in my house is sharing the different items with other family members. That being so, eating out of the containers doesn&#8217;t work very well. I suspect we are not alone. So, again, is it only me that gets annoyed at the cliche of <strong><em>every </em></strong>instance of eating Chinese food shown in a movie or TV show has the characters eating out of the boxes? OK, it is a recognizable motif, but does it advance the story line? No, I think it is lazy writing, lazy directing, lazy editing and lazy producing. Most recent offenders (that I saw): Ghost Whisperer and Numbers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://views.eaglepeakpress.com/2009/01/15/the-chinese-food-container-cliche/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Boston Legal and Boomer TV</title>
		<link>http://views.eaglepeakpress.com/2008/12/18/boston-legal-and-boomer-tv/</link>
		<comments>http://views.eaglepeakpress.com/2008/12/18/boston-legal-and-boomer-tv/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 16:57:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[boomers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reality TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://views.eaglepeakpress.com/?p=215</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So Boston Legal is over. A great show. In its penultimate show, 86-year old Betty White (who played the occasionally recurring character Catherine Piper) went to court to sue the TV networks for failing to provide enough programs for older people. Carl Sachs, played by John Larroquette, cited a load of statistics to show that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So Boston Legal is over. A great show. In its penultimate show, 86-year old Betty White (who played the occasionally recurring character Catherine Piper) went to court to sue the TV networks for failing to provide enough programs for older people. Carl Sachs, played by John Larroquette, cited a load of statistics to show that the sponsor-led programming decisions ignored the greater purchasing power and TV watching habits of those over 50. I couldn&#8217;t agree more. I can&#8217;t stand and watch NO (pseudo) reality shows. There seem to be more and more of them. I agree with Sachs arguments that shows seem to be getting dumbed down to comport better with viewers that may be texting and/or playing on handheld games while watching TV. I can only hope that eventually, as the percentage of the population older than 50 continues to increase, that we will be able to demand changes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://views.eaglepeakpress.com/2008/12/18/boston-legal-and-boomer-tv/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Romancing the Buddha Road Show</title>
		<link>http://views.eaglepeakpress.com/2008/04/17/romancing-the-buddha-road-show/</link>
		<comments>http://views.eaglepeakpress.com/2008/04/17/romancing-the-buddha-road-show/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 23:37:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Applied Buddhism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://views.eaglepeakpress.com/?p=117</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OK, he calls it a one-man play, adapted from his book, but I prefer to call it a road show. Mike Lisagor did a fine job of conveying the life of a buddha as his book does. Playing on the title (Romancing the Stone) of the Michael Douglas/Kathleen Turner movie of (20?) years ago, Lisagor [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, he calls it a one-man play, adapted from his book, but I prefer to call it a road show. Mike Lisagor did a fine job of conveying the life of a buddha as his <a title="Romancing the Buddha" href="http://www.romancingthebuddha.com/home.html" target="_blank">book</a> does. Playing on the title (Romancing the Stone) of the Michael Douglas/Kathleen Turner movie of (20?) years ago, Lisagor reveals the same pathos, humor, drama as the movie. Of course the main difference is the outcome. Romantic as it may seem to escape in the (spoiler alert if you haven&#8217;t seen the movie&#8211;if that is possible) sailboat being towed down the streets of Manhattan, there is guarantee that the joy will continue. It&#8217;s the romance of the buddha that offers absolute happiness&#8211;with the conviction that one is charge of his or her own destiny, not dependent on beneficial circumstances of the moment which cannot last. The one man show will likely be an intermittent thing, here and there as Lisagor travels around for his day job. So get the book.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://views.eaglepeakpress.com/2008/04/17/romancing-the-buddha-road-show/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Disneyworld is Always Right; the Customer is Wrong</title>
		<link>http://views.eaglepeakpress.com/2008/03/25/disneyworld-is-always-right-the-customer-is-wrong/</link>
		<comments>http://views.eaglepeakpress.com/2008/03/25/disneyworld-is-always-right-the-customer-is-wrong/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 11:37:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miscellany]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://views.eaglepeakpress.com/2008/03/25/disneyworld-is-always-right-the-customer-is-wrong/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We had an enjoyable time at Disneyworld this February, save for one sour taste their customer service left in our mouths&#8211;and in our pocket book. Disney puts on a great show, treats patrons graciously at all their attractions, but when it comes to money&#8211;there is no compromise, no negotiation, no capitulation to the old credo [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We had an enjoyable time at Disneyworld this February, save for one sour taste their customer service left in our mouths&#8211;and in our pocket book. Disney puts on a great show, treats patrons graciously at all their attractions, but when it comes to money&#8211;there is no compromise, no negotiation, no capitulation to the old credo of customer satisfaction. One would think with all the gazillions of dollars they rake in and the importance of maintaining good will and repeat business they would treat customers better. <strong><em>Not so!</em></strong>We have gone there several times; we won’t be going again. Meg Crofton, by way of a junior flunky (Meg can&#8217;t be bothered to reply in writing not even by proxy, she just has flunkies call disgruntled customers) says if you can&#8217;t follow our rules tough; if you can&#8217;t prove we screwed up, tough. Well Meg, good luck in a declining economy&#8211;you&#8217;re going to need it.<span id="more-95"></span></p>
<p>We booked a reservation for the RV and ourselves at Fort Wilderness Resort but confirmed it on the phone with a live person. The purpose of the call was to verify that we could get a AAA discount (20%) for the stay. The person my wife spoke to said since we had already made the reservation she could not adjust the price but to just ask for the discount at check-in. So we did that. Having first greeted us warmly, the person at the gate took on the appearance of someone confronted by a bum begging for a handout. &#8220;Oh no, I’m sorry; we are not allowed to change the balance due on your reservation.&#8221; After further discussion, we were told that we could take it up with the manager on duty at that portal into this resort, but those were the rules. The manager had the same unyielding, corporate gatekeeper response. We were told we would have to take it up with the people in charge at the headquarters. We did that in writing, in a letter to Meg Crofton,  head of WDW. Instead of writing a reply, she had a flunky call us back reciting the same litany of why were not entitled to the discount&#8211;no apology that the operater who spoke to us was mistaken and no adjustment in price. The fact is that AAA and other groups get deals on blocks of rooms (or in this case, RV sites) but there were no discounts remaining for that time. The person on the  phone didn&#8217;t tell us that. Maybe we would have gone anyway, maybe not. The problem is that she gave us the wrong information and Disney won&#8217;t accept the consequences of their mistake. That kind of corporate arrogance doesn&#8217;t deserve reward in the form of repeat business; it deserves punishment in the form of warning you away from this greedy bunch. </p>
<p>So if you are thinking about going there, think twice. At the least, get all the financial arrangements in writing because Disney will not bend&#8211;not to you anyway. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://views.eaglepeakpress.com/2008/03/25/disneyworld-is-always-right-the-customer-is-wrong/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Punxatawny</title>
		<link>http://views.eaglepeakpress.com/2008/02/02/punxatawny/</link>
		<comments>http://views.eaglepeakpress.com/2008/02/02/punxatawny/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 22:27:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://views.eaglepeakpress.com/2008/02/02/punxatawny/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Somehow, I keep waking up to this same stupid song by Sonny &#38; Cher. WTF? It must be Bill Murray&#8217;s fault.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Somehow, I keep waking up to this same stupid song by Sonny &amp; Cher. WTF? It must be Bill Murray&#8217;s fault.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://views.eaglepeakpress.com/2008/02/02/punxatawny/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tired butt</title>
		<link>http://views.eaglepeakpress.com/2007/12/05/tired-butt/</link>
		<comments>http://views.eaglepeakpress.com/2007/12/05/tired-butt/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 00:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://views.eaglepeakpress.com/2007/12/05/tired-butt/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, that is what I am suffering from.  I have been sitting in front of my computer for too many hours yesterday and today&#8211;oh, and Monday as well.  Who would have thought that the most tired part of the body resulting from promoting a book could be the butt.  So for that reason, I must [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, that is what I am suffering from.  I have been sitting in front of my computer for too many hours yesterday and today&#8211;oh, and Monday as well.  Who would have thought that the most tired part of the body resulting from promoting a book could be the butt.  So for that reason, I must give it a proper rest.  Before I do, it is time for a comedy break; at least I hope you feel that what I intend as humor seems funny to you.  The best I can offer today, from my list of topical phrases for future use is this:  <strong><em>Burpin&#8217; Brats.  </em></strong>So what&#8217;s that you say? Well, I see it as reality-TV, perhaps a spinoff from Supernanny.  Then again, perhaps even BETTER, maybe a show based on competitive eating contests!  Can&#8217;t you just see&#8211;and <strong>hear</strong> Sonia Thomas cutting loose with a room-shaking belch after downing 50 bratwurst in 3 minutes and 49 seconds?  Perhaps Johnsonville Sausage would not want to sponsor either show, I don&#8217;t know.  If you think so, go ahead and give some network producers a treatment; with the writers strike what have you got to lose.  Just give me a credit if you sell it.  No, wait a minute, I don&#8217;t think I would want my name associated with that&#8211;I HATE reality TV.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://views.eaglepeakpress.com/2007/12/05/tired-butt/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>David Caruso&#8211;Descended from a Parrot?</title>
		<link>http://views.eaglepeakpress.com/2007/10/30/david-caruso-descended-from-a-parrot/</link>
		<comments>http://views.eaglepeakpress.com/2007/10/30/david-caruso-descended-from-a-parrot/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 21:10:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://views.eaglepeakpress.com/2007/10/30/david-caruso-descended-from-a-parrot/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OK, I don&#8217;t see a snarky pose as appropriate for this blog.  But I am still not rid of the cold so I am picking an easy target just so I can say I posted something today.  Plus, I am still trying to get a rise out of readers (all 2 or 3 of you out there).  [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, I don&#8217;t see a snarky pose as appropriate for this blog.  But I am still not rid of the cold so I am picking an easy target just so I can say I posted something today.  Plus, I am still trying to get a rise out of readers (all 2 or 3 of you out there).  Will being snarky help?  Then let&#8217;s get to it. </p>
<p>Take a look at the previews for CSI-Miami (please don&#8217;t watch the show; that is too&#8211;eww!).  Look at Caruso (who plays Horatio Caine) and the next time you&#8217;re at a pet shop or see a parrot on TV, compare the head movements.  See the resemblance?  What normal human being affects such odd head tilts while talking or moving around a room as he does?  Then there&#8217;s the random sunglasses on/off/on/off routine that accompanies the head moves.  This conveys what?! </p>
<p>OK, so parrots don&#8217;t wear sunglasses but if you gave them a pair, I&#8217;ll bet it wouldn&#8217;t be long before they&#8217;re doing an on/off routine imitating people&#8211;especially if they watched Caruso for a day or two.  Perhaps you get the idea that I don&#8217;t think much of his acting ability AND you would be correct!  He seems so entirely full of himself.  Unfortunately for him, what he seems full of is something most people flush away once or twice a day.  I won&#8217;t even comment on the odd intonations, stresses and pauses in his dialogue that seem to be yet another affectation intended to convey some meaning or feeling but which just grates against the senses and conflicts with the plot/simple meaning of words, etc.  About the only sensible role I could see for him would be in a remake of Madonna&#8217;s music video for &#8220;Vogue.&#8221;  Because striking a pose is about all he is capable of.  So I guess he could also make it as a male model.  But as the star of a TV show?  Gimme a break!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://views.eaglepeakpress.com/2007/10/30/david-caruso-descended-from-a-parrot/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
